Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 12 Current »

Purpose of this Article:

Discover information related to how REDCap is used for various clinical data capture workflows.

Data Capture Workflows - REDCap

REDCap supports studies that collect clinical data and allows for a variety of data capture workflows.

Clinician Administered Scales

OPTION 1 - Site clinical staff use paper case report forms (CRFs) and transcribe to REDCap to produce electronic case report forms (eCRFs)

  • Source Document: Paper CRFs.

  • Benefits: N/A.

  • Cons: Incomplete data potential and transcription errors can occur.

  • Site Monitoring? Involved.

OPTION 2 - Site clinical staff enter directly to REDCap eCRF

  • Source Document: electronic CRFs (REDCap).

  • Benefits: No transcription errors, data entry and data capture done at the same time, automated warnings and range checks on the data being entered.

  • Cons: N/A.

  • Site Monitoring? Not usually.

Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs)

OPTION 1 - Patients enter data directly into electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) in REDCap

  • Source Document: electronic PROs (REDCap Surveys).

  • Benefits: No transcription errors, data entry and data capture done at the same time, automated warnings and range checks on the data being entered. Can take place via clinic or at home (via email).

  • Cons: N/A.

  • Site Monitoring? Not usually.

OPTION 2 - Patients use paper PROs and site clinical staff transcribes to ePROs

  • Source Document: Paper PROs.

  • Benefits: Preferred by some participants who are not accustomed to technology, or some scales which require paper forms.

  • Cons: Potential for incomplete data and transcription errors.

  • Site Monitoring? Yes.

  • No labels