Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

During Project Validation an Indoc IDP Lead will validate the REDCap project created by the IDP Neuroinformatics Lead to ensure that data integrity standards are met using the Validation Checklist shown below. A Validation Report will be created with a list of any items flagged during the validation proecand sent to the Neuroinformatics Lead which

Common Data Elements

  • All relevant common data elements (CDEs) are added to the study

  • CDEs are the most recent version(s)

  • No changes have been made to the original CDEs

  • No CDE variable names were used for another eCRF

  • The Subject Enrolment and Informed Consent Form (ICF) contains a SQL consent field ICF that queries the Ethics Tracking Database

  • The Subject Enrolment and Informed Consent Form contains a Brain-CODE subject Subject ID naming checker

Electronic Case Report Forms (eCRFs) and Patient-Reported Outcomes (ePROs)

  • Consistent formatting is used

  • Fonts (type, colour, size) are consistent throughout and are legible

  • No spelling errors

  • All units are included (time, temperature, height, etc)

  • Option coding matches paper versions

...

  • Limited number of free text fields

  • Numeric fields only allow for integers or double numbers

  • Email address fields have email validation

  • When applicable ontology validation is used

  • Tested all fields All fields have been manually tested with validation checks to ensure that they were functioning

...

  • Consistent naming (eCRF has a prefix for all variables)

  • Numbers in variables have leading zeroes

  • No spelling errors are present

  • Naming is as intuitive as possible

  • Consistent abbreviationsAbbreviations are consistent

  • Field labels are accurate

  • Fields have accurate descriptions and notes

Branching Logic

  • No errors occur due to branching logic

  • Branching logic is designed to mimic paper CRF

  • All branching logic has been tested for logic and correctness

...

  • All calculated fields were manually calculated to ensure accuracy of the equation used

  • When applicable add range checksRange checks have been added where applicable

    • For example - if the study is for participants older than 18, may have a range validation may be used for age

  • Automated queries were tested for accuracy

    • Ensured no false positives

    • Ensured no false negatives

  • Range checks were tested reviewed for accuracy

Required Fields

...

  • Correct Data Access Groups have been set up for sites

  • Each eCRF has been assigned to at least one event in the Event Schedule Grid

  • Event grid matches study protocol

  • Arms are appropriately labeled and w/o do not contain spelling errors

  • Each arm has contains at least one event

  • Data entry workflow workflows are as intuitive and as simple as possible